Milan: The statement coat
Worth checking out: An unknown family’s photos
Perhaps it’s because I’ve been working on my family tree with my parents over the past six months or maybe it’s a by-product of my vintage obsession, but I was totally moved by a recent Sartorialist post that a friend just emailed me featuring old images of an unidentified family. I don’t really have too much to say about the blog entry other than that I think it’s really beautiful and unexpected and worth taking a look at. See all of the images here.
Andre’s world (meet the new intern!) – The future looks red
London: Kinds of blue
Random: What a fox
Scratch that, IN with the old…
I’ve decided that 2010 will be the year of vintage, or at least it will be in my closet anyway. For the past few months, I’ve been spending the wee hours of the night trolling the Internet for vintage clothing. It started when I logged onto eBay in search of old Yves Saint Laurent. Somehow, a random listing for the prettiest, most delicate, Victorian lace vintage wedding dress got mixed in with the YSL search results. I personally wouldn’t wear the dress for my ceremony, but I’d totally rock it to a summer party. It wasn’t my size, though.
It’s just a shame that the range isn’t currently available in the States (though I heard, during a recent visit to their studio, that a few U.S. stores may stock up on the Decades collection soon). America sorely needs more contemporary bridal options for fashion-conscious women who don’t necessarily want to wear Vera Wang, Monique Lhuillier or J.Crew. And the bridal world in general seems majorly out of touch with the times. The dresses are either a major investment (Vera) or major steal (J.Crew, which is surprisingly good) with not much in-between. And don’t get me started on the meringues. How about more mid-priced options in edgier silhouettes please? Does Phillip Lim need to launch a wedding collection, hmmm?
But back to my original point about my New Year’s vintage non-resolution. I’ve decided to try updating my wardrobe with more vintage than ready-to-wear (with the exception of shoes.) This is mainly an act of rebellion against the lightning fast trendiness of the past few years. (It’s pointy shoulders! No, it’s studs! Wait, it’s sequins! And leather! Hold up, it’s pointy shoulders AND studs AND sequins AND leather!) It’s also because I’ve spent the past year reading designer biographies and am wanting to get closer to the original source of inspiration. And last, most of the pieces in my wardrobe that I love and cherish the most are vintage. So there you have it.
Happy New Year! (Out with the old…)
– Douglas Adams
